Sunday, April 1, 2018

March For Our Lives


 (Me awkwardly taking a photo because I'm not sure if I should be smiling.)

On March 24, 2017, I participated in the March For Our Lives in Washington, D.C. The event was created in response to mass shootings in public settings. The March For Our lives was created by students of all ethnicities, religions and sexualities across the country. Specifically, the most notable leaders who receive the most media attention are Emma Gonzalez and David Hoggs. However, this event brought together countless other young leaders and celebrities to raise attention to the issue of gun violence in the U.S.

(Photo of crowds and Capitol building)

The mission statement of the March For Our Lives states, “Not one more. We cannot let one more child be shot at school.” The goals are to accomplish the following:

1. Universal, comprehensive background checks
2. Bringing the ATF into the 21st century with a digitized searchable database
3. Funds for the Center for Disease Control to research the gun violence epidemic in America
4. High-capacity magazine ban
5. Assault weapons ban


 (I rode the us with the woman and the Grandma's against Guns sign! She was very nice and wanted to make sure I was going to be warm enough for the day.) 

Because the March For Our Lives was created by students, most of the content was produced and distributed digitally. The movement used a website at https://marchforourlives.com/. The website prompts the user to register to be counted in the movement. The organization is also present on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and Youtube. Several of the links can be found at the bottom of this post.


(Photo of a really cool sign)

Most of the promotion of the event was through Facebook event pages and promoting the issue of gun violence on Twitter. This caused some issues for organizing because multiple unofficial event pages were created. Other organization event pages in support of the event were created. The official March For Our Lives page did not include a time until it was closer to the event. Other public pages had different times. However, these issues did not stop people from coming to the event. CBS News reported that more than 200,000 people participated in the March For Our Lives event in Washington, D.C.  

(Photo of more crowds)

As a participant in the event and the days leading up to it, I thought a lot of the organizing was standard. I did not see anything leading up to the event that was extraordinarily unusual. However, I thought there were some interesting tactics used to tell the narrative during the event.



During the event, there were screens, so people could see anywhere on Pennsylvania Avenue. I was around 9th Street, so I was around the middle. I was a bit of a ways back from a giant screen, and originally, this did not seem unusual to me. I thought they were just projectors for stage images. However, they showed different footage including news coverage and videos from what was happening inside the school during the school shooting. It allowed the organizers to incorporate more interviews of people who were unable to attend, and it made the story more encompassing. It was extremely emotional, and there were several times I found myself crying.

(Photo of another sign)

This tactic was unlike any other that I had seen in a march before. I have been able to attend several other bigger ones, but this one integrated and embedded stories in an innovative way. It was interesting to be a part of the movement, and it was cool to log onto social media to see what other places around the world were doing for their March For Our Lives events.



No comments:

Post a Comment